MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2569674942

The “Murray Look”: Trauma as Family Legacy in L.M. Montgomery’s Emily of New Moon Trilogy

2008· article· en· W2569674942 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Children's Literature / Littérature canadienne pour la jeunesse · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicCrime and Detective Fiction Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Winnipeg
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPortraitWifeTrilogyUncannyAuntDaughterHistoryGenealogyArtArt historyLiteratureLawPhilosophyTheology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In lieu of an abstract, here is an excerpt from this article: When taken in by the Murray family after her father’s death, the title heroine of L.M. Montgomery’s Emily of New Moon discovers that she is heir to an impressive family lineage in which the Murrays take great pride; but the proud ancestors, now at rest in the New Moon cemetery, were no models of peace and harmony when living. Their disputes pitted husband against wife and father against daughter in battles of formative significance to the living characters. When the authoritarian Aunt Elizabeth tries to cut Emily’s hair, Emily’s defiance is heightened, almost supernaturally, by her use of the intimidating “Murray look,” an inheritance from her grandfather (Elizabeth’s father), Archibald Murray. Cowed by Emily’s uncanny channelling of this patriarchal authority, Elizabeth gives up on the haircut, but she takes her revenge later on by locking Emily in the terrifying spare room, home to Archibald’s menacing portrait.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.796
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.203
Teacher spread0.190 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it