MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2571018855 · doi:10.1109/jphotov.2016.2638040

Efficient Multijunction Solar Cell Design for Maximum Annual Energy Yield by Representative Spectrum Selection

2017· article· en· W2571018855 on OpenAlexafffund
Mark D. Yandt, Karin Hinzer, Henry Schriemer

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Journal of Photovoltaics · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
Topicsolar cell performance optimization
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsSolar cellComputer scienceSolar energyRSSYield (engineering)Environmental sciencePhysicsOptoelectronicsElectrical engineeringEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We describe a systematic approach to multijunction solar cell (MJSC) design that unambiguously identifies the spectrum to be used in cell optimization such that local annual energy yield is maximized. A set of candidate spectra is generated from air mass (AM) values ranging from AM1d to AM5d. Each candidate spectrum is used to find the bandgap combination that maximizes cell efficiency and its energy yield is then calculated using an efficient data reduction approach. The bandgap combination that maximizes annual energy yield identifies the representative spectrum. We do this for cells with up to eight junctions across all clear-sky latitudes and compare our results to other cell optimization approaches. Our representative spectrum selection (RSS) approach is robust and highly tolerant of variations in latitude, particularly when compared to the standard AM1.5d approach which, at midlatitudes, cannot be used without suffering an increasingly severe yield penalty. Comparison against the 50% cumulative energy AM (50% AM) design approach is enabled by using the same design conditions (sea level and ASTM standard atmosphere) in order to unambiguously associate each 50% AM value with a cell design spectrum. We find that our RSS approach always produces cells with slightly higher annual energy yields than are achieved by the corresponding 50% AM designs. While both approaches show similar yields for devices with few junctions, we find yield enhancements approaching 1% for cell designs with many junctions, emphasizing the need to consider the spectral variability of the local solar resource. This consideration is systematically enabled by our RSS approach, addressing a deficiency in the previous design approaches.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.232
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2017
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Journal of PhotovoltaicsSame topicsolar cell performance optimizationFrench-language works237,207