MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2574029162 · doi:10.5555/3042094.3042493

Application of wide-band liquid crystal reflective windows in building energy efficiency: a case study of educational buildings

2016· article· en· W2574029162 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueWinter Simulation Conference · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicTransition Metal Oxide Nanomaterials
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBroadbandEnergy consumptionWindow (computing)Efficient energy useArchitectural engineeringComputer scienceEngineeringTelecommunicationsElectrical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The purpose of this article is to study the impact of seven different window systems on overall energy consumption of educational buildings. In particular, four of the windows are non-traditional liquid crystal base, namely 1) Tunable, 2) Broadband Type 1, 3) Broadband Type 2, and 4) Broadband Type 3. For the purpose of simulation, a LEED Gold certified building located at a major university in the U.S. was modeled, benchmarked, and calibrated. Then several scenarios according to window choices haven been tested, both in actual and different climate zones. The results show, Broadband Type 2 and Type 3 can make a significant impact in reducing building energy consumption. Their contribution is higher for projects located in hotter climates.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.209
Threshold uncertainty score0.540

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.306
Teacher spread0.285 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it