Parametric Study on Mechanical Responses of Corrugated-Core Sandwich Panels for Bridge Decks
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A critical challenge in bridge design and the construction process is to reduce the weight of the bridge deck. Specifically, in small aged bridges, light modules provide an easy and fast bridge deck renewal. Sandwich panels were introduced as such lightweight bridge decks a few decades ago. Low density and high specific strength of the panels provide remarkable advantages for a wide variety of industrial applications. The objective of this study was to investigate the effect of geometric parameters on the mechanical behavior (deflection and shear force) of a corrugated-core steel sandwich panel and predict its response by developing mathematical regression models. The results reveal that the core and the face sheet thicknesses highly affect the panel deflection response, whereas the weld spacing has the highest contribution to the maximum shear force response.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it