MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2574203314 · doi:10.1103/physrevd.95.084014

Testing strong-field gravity with tidal Love numbers

2017· article· en· W2574203314 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical review. D/Physical review. D. · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicPulsars and Gravitational Waves Research
Canadian institutionsPerimeter Institute
FundersHorizon 2020 Framework ProgrammeInstitut Périmètre de physique théoriqueFundação para a Ciência e a TecnologiaStrongSeventh Framework ProgrammeMinistero dello Sviluppo EconomicoEuropean CommissionH2020 European Research CouncilIndustry CanadaOntario Ministry of Economic Development and InnovationStony Brook UniversityGovernment of Canada
KeywordsPhysicsLIGOGeneral relativityBlack hole (networking)Gravitational waveBinary black holeHorizonGravitationTheoretical physicsTests of general relativityEvent horizonGravitational fieldClassical mechanicsNumerical relativityAstrophysicsAstronomy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The authors calculate the tidal Love numbers (TLN), which encode the effect of rapidly changing gravitational fields on deformable, self-gravitating objects, for various exotic compact objects. They have found a universal logarithmic dependence of the TLNs close to black holes and use this to propose future gravitational wave measurements of TLNs, which would provide a test for general relativity in the strong field regime.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.339
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.482
Teacher spread0.454 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it