Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
![Figure][1] CREDIT: SSPL/GETTY IMAGES Where are those Consumer Reports people when you need them? Prospector and mine worker Mark Brown of Yellowknife in the far north of Canada has got a deal for you: a fist-size chunk of the planet's oldest known rock for just $149.99 (Canadian), $249.99 with a nifty pyramidal display case. Brown has a claim on a remote island in the Acasta River, 300 kilometers north of Yellowknife, that contains gneiss that formed 4.03 billion years ago, little more than half a billion years after Earth did. “Not what I would say is the flashiest of rocks,” says Brown in his 10-minute promotional video ( ), “but I find it very, very inspiring.” But geochronologist Samuel Bowring of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology in Cambridge, who dated the famed Acasta gneiss with colleagues, warns that similar-looking rock at the site is hundreds of millions of years younger. Brown “has no way of guaranteeing” that his samples are in fact the oldest rock, Bowring says. Aside from that, the offering doesn't really bother him. “If selling that rock exposes a bunch of people to the fact that Earth is 4.6 billion years old, it's a good thing.” [1]: pending:yes
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it