MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2577331444 · doi:10.1177/102452940100500202

From a Developmental State to a Competition State? Conceptualising the Mexican Political Economy within Global Financial Orthodoxy

2001· article· en· W2577331444 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueCompetition & Change · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicGlobal Financial Crisis and Policies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsState (computer science)OrthodoxyCompetition (biology)Neoliberalism (international relations)PoliticsCapital (architecture)EconomicsPower (physics)Developmental statePolitical economyEconomic systemEconomic powerInvestment (military)Political scienceMarket economyGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper sets out to explore the changing political and economic landscape of the Mexican state against the backdrop of the growing disciplinary power of the globalised financial markets (e.g., capital flight and investment strikes). Specifically it asks if the general defining characteristics of a neoliberal “competition state” found in the advanced industrialised countries (AICs) can be applied to the Mexican case. The paper sustains that although the Mexican state conforms to the basic features of a neoliberal competition state, this transformation has brought about neither sustained economic growth nor less dependence on external sources of capital. A fundamental reason for this failure lies in the highly contradictory nature of the stale's neoliberal policy formulation that is marked by domestic objectives such as subduing class conflict and international exigencies such as signalling creditworthiness.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.669
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.071
GPT teacher head0.268
Teacher spread0.197 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it