MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2578512829 · doi:10.1016/s0098-7913(02)00231-9

Digital Futures: Strategies for the Information Age

2002· article· en· W2578512829 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueSerials Review · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicDigital Games and Media
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFutures contractComputer scienceBusinessFinance

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Click to increase image sizeClick to decrease image size Notes1 The concept of a paradigm shift derives from the work of Thomas Kuhn on the nature of scientific revolutions. His variable use of the concept has almost nothing to do with the application made by librarians writing about automation and digital publishing. Kuhn's explication of the concept is very like that of his mentor James B. Conant, as it appears in the latter's popular works on the nature and history of science.2 These remarks are from a panel discussion entitled "The Future of Anglo-American Cataloging Rules, presented on March 27, 1999 at the Art Libraries Society of North America, Annual Conference, Vancouver, BC, http://www.arlisna.org/Conf_1999/aacr2.htm (27 August 2002).3 Some of the dangers inherent in automated metadata harvesting are amusingly surveyed by Cory Doctorow at http://www.well.com/~doctorow/metacrap.htm#0 (27 August 2002).4 The Phantom Tollbooth, written by Juster Norton and illustrated by Jules Feiffer, was published in 1961 (New York: Random House) and has had numerous reprintings.5 The authors point out, for example, that we have come a long way in understanding the durability of digital storage media. CD-R (compact disc–recordable) may actually turn out to be fairly suitable for long-term preservation if managed carefully. The longevity of CD-R disks appears to be affected largely by three factors: substrate material, reflective surface material, and dye. Oxidation, substrate degradation, loss of reflectivity, and other causes of aging are all implicated in data loss over time on CD-R media. Notwithstanding, there have been significant improvements in both design and construction of CD-R media that permit some confidence in the format for archival storage and preservation of electronic data. Longevity estimates for recorded disks now range from one hundred years upwards if storage conditions are controlled and stable. We do not have anything like this kind of real-world experience with the technology. Estimates of longevity are entirely a matter of reaction to accelerated aging tests, not actual historical conditions. A very helpful discussion of these and related issues can be found in Susan S. Lazinger's Digital Preservation and Metadata (Englewood, CO: Libraries Unlimited, 2001) and in various publications of the Council on Library and Information Resources.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.958
Threshold uncertainty score0.466

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.046
GPT teacher head0.316
Teacher spread0.270 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it