MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2583530447

Sobre el origen hispánico del nombre ‘Canadá’

2016· article· es· W2583530447 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueRepository of Digital Objects for Teaching Research and Culture (University of Valencia) · 2016
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicBasque language and culture studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPortugueseHumanitiesFifteenthHistoryArtToponymyArchaeologyAncient historyPhilosophyLinguistics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

La presencia española y portuguesa en Canadá es mucho más temprana de lo que habitualmente se piensa. La documentación sobre muchos de estos viajes es escasa debido a que la mayoría de ellos fueron realizados por pescadores de ballena y bacalao. La toponimia de los primeros mapas así como el testimonio de algunos documentos demuestran que desde finales del siglo xv y principios del xvi la presencia hispana por esas aguas y tierras es constante. La palabra «Canadá» será un buen ejemplo más.; The Spanish and Portuguese presence in Canada is much earlier than is usually thought. The documentation on many of these trips is scarce because most of them were made mostly by Basque and Portuguese whale and cod fishermen. The toponymy of the first maps and the testimony of some documents show that from the late fifteenth and early sixteenth century the Hispanic presence by those waters and lands is constant. The word «Canada» is a good example .

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.174
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.310
Teacher spread0.284 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it