MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2583613911 · doi:10.1002/env.2437

Model‐based clustering for spatiotemporal data on air quality monitoring

2017· article· en· W2583613911 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueEnvironmetrics · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicBayesian Methods and Mixture Models
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCluster analysisData miningComputer scienceAutoregressive modelMixture modelIdentifiabilityExpectation–maximization algorithmInformation CriteriaModel selectionBayesian information criterionAir quality indexStatisticsMathematicsMaximum likelihoodArtificial intelligenceMachine learningGeographyMeteorology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Data extracted from air quality monitoring can require spatiotemporal clustering techniques. Of late, many clustering techniques are based on mixture models; however, there is a shortage of model‐based approaches for spatiotemporal data. A new mixture to cluster spatiotemporal data, named STM, is introduced, and generic identifiability is proved. The resulting model defines each mixture component as a mixture of autoregressive polynomial regressions in which the weights consider the spatial and temporal information with logistic links. Under the maximum likelihood framework, parameter estimation is carried out via an expectation–maximization algorithm while classical information criteria can be used for model selection. The proposed model is applied to air quality monitoring data from the periphery of Paris considering one of the critical pollutants, nitrogen dioxide, at different times during the day. The STM model is implemented in the R package SpaTimeClust .

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.957
Threshold uncertainty score0.622

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0030.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.248
GPT teacher head0.400
Teacher spread0.152 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it