MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2584492552

Prediction of rainfall-runoff processes through black-box techniques

2015· other· en· W2584492552 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueDR-NTU (Nanyang Technological University) · 2015
Typeother
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicHydrological Forecasting Using AI
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSurface runoffBlack boxEnvironmental scienceHydrology (agriculture)MeteorologyGeologyGeographyComputer scienceArtificial intelligenceGeotechnical engineering
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Hydrological forecasting techniques have been dramatically developed today. However, traditional predicting methods confront difficulties due to the diverse applications in water resource and management with complex and non-linear rainfall-runoff relationships associated with it. This project focused on artificial neural network (ANN) model which attempts to process the data in manner of black-box-based models, providing more reliable but time-efficient estimates regarding rainfall-runoff information. Without considering all the influencing factors in the process of calibration, ANN provides a more systematic alternative to simulate behaviors of historical data and operate adaptively by its predictive capability. Therefore, ANN method has currently been achieved an improvement of accuracy and flexibility compared with existing traditional and linear regression methods. In this study, the historical data ranging from 1970 to 1985, extracted from Kootenay River Watershed at state of British Columbia in Canada, was used to assess the ability of ANN. The extracted data comprised daily precipitation, daily minimum and maximum temperature, daily sunlight radiation and daily runoff from three hydrometric stations and three meteorological stations located along Kootenay River. Levenberg-Marquardt Backpropagation (LMBP) was used as training algorithm in ANN model. In order to generate an optimum prediction, different numbers and combinations of data were used as inputs to maximize the efficiency of ANN model. Two evaluators, including coefficient of determination (R2) and mean squared error (MSE), were used to assess the performance of ANN model. This study indicated that ANN model was able to produce favorable outcomes and it was simple to be learnt and used in complex hydrological forecasting by using Graphical User Interface (GUI) provided in neural network toolbox of Matlab R2013a. The significance of daily runoff data was highlighted in this study while the daily precipitation data was unable to generate reasonable outputs with a value of R2 closing to 1. The results also showed that the more inputs parameters used would help in gaining more accurate outcomes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.086
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.211
Teacher spread0.181 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it