Waterflooding a Multi-layered Tight Oil Reservoir Developed with Hydraulically Fractured Horizontal Wells
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract A successful waterflood can be implemented in a multi-layered tight oil reservoir developed with horizontal multi-fractured wells. This paper forecasts the recovery factor that can be achieved in such a reservoir as well as discusses the challenges of analyzing and modelling tight oil reservoirs developed with multi-fractured horizontal wells. With some unconventional reservoirs that are hydraulically fractured, a phenomenon exists whereby material balance and simulation indicate pressure support from a water source that is not always obvious. This phenomenon is believed to be related to the multi-layered silts/shales in the reservoir and is not typically seen in simulation of conventional higher permeability reservoirs (Kair >10 mD). Although, the exact petrophysical nature of the silts/shale reservoir layers in this project are not well defined at this time, a successful production history match can be achived by incorporating their input into a simulation model.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it