MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2586422076 · doi:10.2118/185077-ms

Multivariate Analysis Using Advanced Probabilistic Techniques for Completion Design Optimization

2017· article· en· W2586422076 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueSPE Unconventional Resources Conference · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicReservoir Engineering and Simulation Methods
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceProbabilistic logicNormalization (sociology)Multivariate statisticsTransparency (behavior)Sample size determinationSet (abstract data type)Data miningMachine learningArtificial intelligenceStatisticsMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Efforts to identify optimal completion technology and design parameters are complicated by the compounding impacts of broad statistical variability in operations, reservoir/fluid and completion/wellbore design. There are several analysis approaches available to identify and optimize key completion design parameters. Each approach offers limited insight on its own, but combining a set of approaches into a disciplined methodology can collectively present a unique understanding of optimal completion technology and design. Traditional parallel coordinates visualizations offer strong visual cues of correlations, but in datasets with broad statistical variability they often convey a lack of correlation and fail to distinguish statistical trends. Statistical methods are unique in their ability to provide insights into non-continuous correlations where upper and lower thresholds exist; however, they are not effective at providing a deterministic measure of an individual input's effect on an outcome. Modelling and regression analysis can provide a means to measure the effect of several input variables on an outcome, but lack transparency and are often perceived as a "black box" solution with outcomes that have limited supporting evidence, or supporting evidence that is difficult to understand. We demonstrate a robust multivariate analysis methodology using a hybrid approach involving the principles of parallel coordinates, dimensional normalization and advanced probabilistic techniques. One of the benefits of this approach is that it can yield statistically significant insights on sample sets as small as 80 wells. The methodology involves six steps that offer transparency to the analysis and facilitate a narrative of understanding: Selection of a performance measure setAnalogue well selectionSelection of numerical completion design input parametersParallel Coordinates Distributions: input parameter impact analysisEvaluation of analogue fitness and subset selectionInput Optimization Distributions: input optimization process We found that the use of consistent dimensional normalization on both inputs and outcomes better isolates the impact of an input parameter. The shape and position of parallel coordinates distributions can illustrate nuances of impact that are lost in other multivariate approaches. In this paper we apply and test this methodology on three major resource plays in the Western Canadian Sedimentary Basin: a gas play, a liquids-rich gas play and an oil play.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.470
Threshold uncertainty score0.678

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.081
GPT teacher head0.336
Teacher spread0.254 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it