MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2586830390 · doi:10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjx002.626

P502 Ulcerative colitis patients on vedolizumab lacking response at induction phase continue to improve over the first 6 months of treatment

2017· article· en· W2586830390 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Crohn s and Colitis · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMicroscopic Colitis
Canadian institutionsLunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research InstituteUniversity of TorontoMount Sinai Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsVedolizumabMedicineUlcerative colitisInternal medicineHazard ratioProportional hazards modelUnivariate analysisAdverse effectGastroenterologyDiscontinuationMultivariate analysisSurgeryConfidence intervalDisease

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Vedolizumab, a gut-selective anti-integrin inhibitor, is a biologic agent indicated for ulcerative colitis (UC) treatment. We retrospectively assessed the real-world efficacy and safety of vedolizumab as induction and maintenance therapy in UC patients. Methods: Adult UC patients followed at a tertiary IBD center and treated with vedolizumab were included. All patients received infusions at 0, 2, and 6 weeks and then every 8 weeks. Six-month cumulative rates of clinical remission (CR, partial Mayo score≤2) and steroid-free clinical remission (SFCR) were assessed with Kaplan-Meier survival analyses. Univariate and multivariable Cox proportional hazard (PH) analyses were performed to identify among baseline variables independent predictors of clinical remission. Hospitalizations, surgeries and adverse events were recorded. Results: Fifty-seven patients were analyzed (Table 1). At 2 months, CR and SFCR were 37% and 30%. At 6 months, the cumulative rates of CR and SFCR were 49% and 44% (Table 1, Fig. 1). Among patients who were not in CR after 3 infusions (n=36) the probability of remission with continuation of vedolizumab was 25% (9/36) at 6 months. Pairwise analyses showed significant improvement in median partial Mayo scores and median CRP levels over the 6-month period compared to baseline (Fig. 1). Cox PH analysis revealed a 3-fold increase in the probability of clinical remission at 6 months among patients with baseline CRP levels less than 5mg/L (univariate analysis, hazard ratio [HR]: 2.55, 95% CI: 1.17–5.57, p=0.019; multivariate analysis, HR: 2.72, 95% CI: 1.24–5.97, p=0.012) and mild baseline disease (univariate analysis, HR: 2.48, 95% CI: 1.2–5.54, p=0.026; multivariate analysis, HR: 2.86, 95% CI: 1.27–6.44, p=0.011) compared with those who did not (Fig. 1). Cumulative rates of colectomy were 5%, 9%, and 14% at 2, 4 and 6 months respectively. The most common side effect was headache. Figure 1. Clinical remission rates in UC patients on conitnuous vedolizumab for 6 months. Conclusions: In our study, 35% of UC patients, most of whom were unresponsive to anti-TNFs, achieved CR after induction and 50% were in CR at six months with vedolizumab maintenance treatment. We did not observe severe adverse events. Our data would indicate that a significant proportion of patients who had not achieved response at 2 months may go on to achieve CR by 6 months of continued therapy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.845
Threshold uncertainty score0.479

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.316
Teacher spread0.297 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it