MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2586878109 · doi:10.7939/r38h75

The Battle Over Belarus: The Rise and Fall of the Belarusian National Movement, 1906-1931

2010· dissertation· en· W2586878109 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueLund University Publications (Lund University) · 2010
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEastern European Communism and Reforms
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIntelligentsiaPolitical scienceCommunismNationalismOpposition (politics)National QuestionPoliticsEconomic historyPopulationDemocracyBattleDemiseNationalityPolitical economyDevelopment economicsLawHistoryAncient historySociologyDemography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study examines the rise and fall of the modern Belarusian national movement during the quarter century between 1906 , the year when the first Belarusian paper appeared, until its demise around 1931, as a result of political repression in the Soviet Union and Poland. It surveys the emergence of the modern concept of a Belarusian nation, from the first steps towards national consolidation in the pre‐revolutionary era, through the energizing of the national movement following the February Revolution and the German occupation, the Soviet experiments in nation building during the 1920s. It analyses the difficulties linked to the establishment of Belarusian national communism, let alone the modern, ethnic definition of nationality in an economically disadvantaged, and relatively underdeveloped region. In Western Belarus, which was under Polish rule between 1921 and 1939, the peasantry was often alienated from the nationalist intelligentsia. In the BSSR the local population often misunderstood the Soviet nationalities policies, resisting new and unknown taxonomies. The result of these experimental policies were not what Moscow had expected. While the Soviet nationalities policies, known as Belarusization came to exercise considerable attraction on the emerging national movement in Western Belarus, in the BSSR they resulted in an increasingly independent leadership in Moscow. After Piłsudski’s coup d’état established authoritarian rule to Poland in 1926, the Soviet government became concerned about a Polish invasion. While the Belarusization had strengthened the nationally conscious elites in the republic, it had failed to generate support for Soviet rule. By 1929-1930, opposition to unpopular Soviet polices, such as the collectivization, brought the borderlands close to a popular uprising, which was followed by a crackdown on the national communists in Minsk. The purges of the elites in the BSSR were more thorough than in any other republic, leading to the demise of 90 per cent of the Belarusian intelligentsia. While the repression took different forms in Poland, from 1927 Piłsudski's sanacja regime banned, jailed and deported to the Soviet Union the leading Belarusian activists, and stepped up the attempts to Polonize Western Belarus. The national mobilization was interrupted. For the next six decades the Soviet Belarusian nation building was carried out from above, increasingly in the Russian language, and with little autonomy for the government in Minsk.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.988
Threshold uncertainty score0.995

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0060.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.232
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it