MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2586878109 · doi:10.7939/r38h75

The Battle Over Belarus: The Rise and Fall of the Belarusian National Movement, 1906-1931

2010· dissertation· en· W2586878109 on OpenAlexaff
Per Anders Rudling

Bibliographic record

VenueLund University Publications (Lund University) · 2010
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEastern European Communism and Reforms
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIntelligentsiaPolitical scienceCommunismNationalismOpposition (politics)National QuestionPoliticsEconomic historyPopulationDemocracyBattleDemiseNationalityPolitical economyDevelopment economicsLawHistoryAncient historySociologyDemography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study examines the rise and fall of the modern Belarusian national movement during the quarter century between 1906 , the year when the first Belarusian paper appeared, until its demise around 1931, as a result of political repression in the Soviet Union and Poland. It surveys the emergence of the modern concept of a Belarusian nation, from the first steps towards national consolidation in the pre‐revolutionary era, through the energizing of the national movement following the February Revolution and the German occupation, the Soviet experiments in nation building during the 1920s. It analyses the difficulties linked to the establishment of Belarusian national communism, let alone the modern, ethnic definition of nationality in an economically disadvantaged, and relatively underdeveloped region. In Western Belarus, which was under Polish rule between 1921 and 1939, the peasantry was often alienated from the nationalist intelligentsia. In the BSSR the local population often misunderstood the Soviet nationalities policies, resisting new and unknown taxonomies. The result of these experimental policies were not what Moscow had expected. While the Soviet nationalities policies, known as Belarusization came to exercise considerable attraction on the emerging national movement in Western Belarus, in the BSSR they resulted in an increasingly independent leadership in Moscow. After Piłsudski’s coup d’état established authoritarian rule to Poland in 1926, the Soviet government became concerned about a Polish invasion. While the Belarusization had strengthened the nationally conscious elites in the republic, it had failed to generate support for Soviet rule. By 1929-1930, opposition to unpopular Soviet polices, such as the collectivization, brought the borderlands close to a popular uprising, which was followed by a crackdown on the national communists in Minsk. The purges of the elites in the BSSR were more thorough than in any other republic, leading to the demise of 90 per cent of the Belarusian intelligentsia. While the repression took different forms in Poland, from 1927 Piłsudski's sanacja regime banned, jailed and deported to the Soviet Union the leading Belarusian activists, and stepped up the attempts to Polonize Western Belarus. The national mobilization was interrupted. For the next six decades the Soviet Belarusian nation building was carried out from above, increasingly in the Russian language, and with little autonomy for the government in Minsk.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.129
Threshold uncertainty score0.257

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0070.005
Scholarly communication0.0030.003
Open science0.0000.003
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.232
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLund University Publications (Lund University)Same topicEastern European Communism and ReformsFrench-language works237,207