MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2587005509 · doi:10.1115/imece2016-65537

Adaptive Topology Optimization Using a Continuous Approximation of Material Distribution

2016· article· en· W2587005509 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicTopology Optimization in Engineering
Canadian institutionsYork University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTopology optimizationFinite element methodTopology (electrical circuits)Mathematical optimizationShape optimizationScalingVoid (composites)Boundary (topology)MathematicsOptimal designOptimization problemComputer scienceMathematical analysisGeometryStructural engineeringEngineeringMaterials science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Structural topology optimization seeks to distribute material in a design domain to produce the stiffest structure for a given mass or the lightest structure for a given strength. In the density-based approach to topology optimization, the design domain is divided into small elements and an optimization algorithm determines whether each element in the optimal design contains solid material or void. Solutions obtained using this method may suffer from a variety of issues, such as a checkerboard pattern of solid and void elements, large transition regions between solid and void parts of the structure, and dependence of the final solution on the initial mesh. Typically, these issues are mitigated using filters, projection functions, or a combination of the two. However, applying these techniques requires the user to select a few parameter values and the optimal design strongly depends on the selected parameters. This work presents an alternative approach to addressing the aforementioned issues in density-based topology optimization. Rather than assigning a separate design variable to each element in the domain, a continuous approximation of the density field is used. This field is interpolated using finite element shape functions with the scaling coefficients of these shape functions acting as design variables in the optimization problem. Although this technique is known to produce an optimal design that is free of checkerboard patterns, it leads to a large transition region at the boundary of the structure whose size depends on the size of the finite elements used. To systematically reduce the size of this transition region, the finite element mesh is locally refined near the structural boundary and the design is optimized again. Because the mesh implicitly controls the size of the transition region, local refinement and optimization continue until the smallest cells in the mesh reach an acceptable resolution. A local refinement indicator is developed to identify and refine cells lying in the transition region. Local isotropic mesh refinement is used to maintain reasonable cell sizes over most of the design domain and, consequently, keep the computational cost of both the finite element analysis and the optimization down. Anisotropic mesh refinement may also be used with a suitable indicator, though it is not demonstrated here. While both continuous density parametrization and adaptive mesh refinement have been applied independently to problems in topology optimization, this work applies them simultaneously for the first time. Structural designs produced by this method are shown to be free of checkerboard patterns and contain features whose size is largely controlled by the initial coarse mesh. In addition, the boundary can be sharply identified for additional processing, such as translation to a CAD file in preparation for fabrication and manufacturing. A disadvantage of the current method is that small features may emerge in the refined parts of the mesh after multiple refinements. Computations were carried out using open-source finite-element analysis and optimization tools. Results are presented for a pair of well-known two-dimensional topology optimization test problems. While not demonstrated in this work, the methodology can be extended easily to three-dimensional problems.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.857
Threshold uncertainty score0.417

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.202
Teacher spread0.194 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicTopology Optimization in EngineeringFrench-language works237,207