Bibliographic record
Abstract
Book Review| March 01 2016 Review: The SAAL Process: Housing in Portugal 1974–76 The SAAL Process: Housing in Portugal 1974–76 Serralves Museum of Contemporary Art, Porto, Portugal 1 November 2014–1 February 2015 Canadian Centre for Architecture, Montreal 12 May–4 October 2015 Peter Sealy Peter Sealy Harvard University Search for other works by this author on: This Site PubMed Google Scholar Journal of the Society of Architectural Historians (2016) 75 (1): 120–121. https://doi.org/10.1525/jsah.2016.75.1.120 Views Icon Views Article contents Figures & tables Video Audio Supplementary Data Peer Review Share Icon Share Facebook Twitter LinkedIn MailTo Tools Icon Tools Get Permissions Cite Icon Cite Search Site Citation Peter Sealy; Review: The SAAL Process: Housing in Portugal 1974–76. Journal of the Society of Architectural Historians 1 March 2016; 75 (1): 120–121. doi: https://doi.org/10.1525/jsah.2016.75.1.120 Download citation file: Ris (Zotero) Reference Manager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex toolbar search Search Dropdown Menu toolbar search search input Search input auto suggest filter your search All ContentJournal of the Society of Architectural Historians Search Against Le Corbusier's opposition of architecture and revolution one may instead ask whether architecture—as a process rather than as an object—can itself be a form of revolution. The SAAL Process convincingly answered this question in the affirmative. An offshoot of Portugal's 1974 Carnation Revolution, the Serviço Ambulatório de Apoio Local (Local Ambulatory Support Service) was enacted by a decree of the provisional government on 6 August 1974. While SAAL was a direct consequence of the revolution, it sprung from research on housing conditions in the 1960s conducted by architects Nuno Portas and Fernando Távora. Instituted during Portas's nine months as secretary of state for housing and urban planning, SAAL was a government-funded initiative to empower the massive numbers of previously voiceless (and often illiterate) Portuguese living in substandard housing at the time of the revolution.1 The SAAL process was a performative one in which experts had to learn to... You do not currently have access to this content.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.012 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.004 | 0.007 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.027 | 0.010 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".