Kiln-drying optimization for quality pacific coast hemlock timber
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The pacific coast hemlock or “hem-fir” is a dominant species mix in British Columbia that is difficult to kiln-dry; hence, many mills are quite conservative with their drying schedules. Furthermore, mills tend to dry hem-fir with no green moisture content presorting, thus promoting high moisture differences within and between dried timbers. In this study, application of green chain moisture-based sorting, coupled with a modified drying schedule, was considered to be a potential way to improve drying times, moisture content spreads, and lumber quality. Modified schedules coupled to three-group green moisture content presorting, i.e., mixed, low, and high, were compared to a standard industrial one. To evaluate the process and product quality, final moisture content variation between and within lumbers, drying rates, warp, surface and internal checks, shrinkage, and casehardening were assessed. Data analysis revealed that there was no significant difference between the drying runs in terms of final moisture content variation, except in the high initial moisture content group. In regard to the sorting, high initial moisture content sorting helped to reduce the final moisture content variation. In particular, the modified schedule, when there was a high initial moisture content sorting, did improve the uniformity of final moisture content in comparison to the industrial one.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".