MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2588183888 · doi:10.2118/185067-ms

Simultaneous Capillary Pressure and Wettability Determination for Tight Bakken Cores Using an Ultra-High-Speed Centrifuge

2017· article· en· W2588183888 on OpenAlexaff
Peng Luo, Sheng Li

Bibliographic record

VenueSPE Unconventional Resources Conference · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicHydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysis
Canadian institutionsSaskatchewan Research Council (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWettingCapillary pressureCentrifugeImbibitionCapillary actionPulmonary surfactantPetroleum engineeringSaturation (graph theory)GeologyOil shaleRelative permeabilityPorous mediumMaterials scienceMineralogyGeotechnical engineeringComposite materialChemistryPorosity

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Capillary pressure and wettability play crucial roles in controlling fluid flow and distribution in tight/shale reservoirs with its nano- to micrometer-scale pore sizes, such as the Bakken formation in the Williston Basin. Because wettability reflects the interactions between rock surfaces and fluids, the introduction of external fluids during drilling, completion, and enhanced oil recovery processes may possibly alter wettability through chemical adsorption on rock surfaces. Therefore, accurate determination of Bakken formation wettability, particularly its alteration caused by different injection fluids, is extremely important in the Bakken production process. In this study, a state-of-the-art ultra-high-speed centrifuge was employed to measure capillary pressures and examine the wettability of Bakken cores by calculating the USBM (United States Bureau of Mines) wettability indices. Cores saturated and aged with formation brine or surfactant solutions were first injected with Bakken crude oil (i.e., drainage process). Then the fluids in the cores were displaced by brine or surfactant solutions to obtain the imbibition capillary pressure curve. Multi-speed measurements were conducted using the centrifuge to determine the capillary pressure between the crude oil and brine/surfactant solutions. Wettability and its alteration after surfactant saturation were quantified by analyzing different sets of wettability indices calculated from capillary pressure curves. The experimental results revealed that wettability alteration caused by surfactant adsorption on rock surfaces tended to change the rocks from water-wet to a more neutral-wet status, while the aging process partially restored the cores to water-wet again. For unconventional tight cores such as Bakken, the ultra-high-speed centrifuge method presents several distinct advantages over the commonly used mercury injection capillary pressure (MICP) method combined with other wettability measurement methods: (1) actual reservoir oil and brine are used, so that results are more representative of field conditions; (2) it is a non-destructive method so that core plugs can be reused to study wettability alteration caused by chemical additives; and (3) capillary pressure, wettability, and relative permeability can be obtained from the same set of measurements.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.268
Teacher spread0.239 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSPE Unconventional Resources ConferenceSame topicHydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysisFrench-language works237,207