MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2588200775 · doi:10.2113/gselements.13.2.89

Magmatic Sulfide Ore Deposits

2017· article· en· W2588200775 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Stephen J. Barnes, David A. Holwell, Margaux Le Vaillant

Bibliographic record

VenueElements · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological and Geochemical Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersBayer CanadaAustralian SynchrotronCommonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation
KeywordsCitationVolcanogenic massive sulfide ore depositSulfideGeochemistryHistoryGeologyArchaeologyLibrary scienceComputer scienceChemistryPyriteSphalerite

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Magmatic sulfide ore deposits are products of natural smelting: concentration of elements from silicate magmas (slags) by immiscible sulfide liquid (matte). Deposits occupy a spectrum from accumulated pools of matte within small igneous intrusions or lava flows, forming orebodies mined primarily for Ni and Cu, to stratiform layers of weakly disseminated sulfides, mined for platinum group elements, within large mafic-ultramafic intrusions. One of the world’s most valuable deposits, the Platreef in the Bushveld Complex in South Africa, has aspects of both of these end members. Natural matte compositions vary widely between and within deposits, controlled largely by the relative volumes of matte and slag that interact with one another.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.026

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.225
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations94
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueElementsSame topicGeological and Geochemical AnalysisFrench-language works237,207