MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2588329791 · doi:10.3130/aije.71.1_5

A CALCULATION METHOD FOR PREDICTING HEAT DETECTOR'S RESPONSE

2006· article· en· W2588329791 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Environmental Engineering (Transactions of AIJ) · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicFire dynamics and safety research
Canadian institutionsResearch & Development Corporation
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDetectorCeiling (cloud)Response timeMechanicsComputer scienceMathematicsAcousticsPhysicsOpticsMeteorology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Utilizing a zone model and a ceiling-jet model, a simple calculation method for predicting heat detector's response is presented. The parameters are the floor area and the ceiling height of the room, the radial distance of the detector from the fire axes, time history of the heat release rate of the fire, and the response characteristics of the detector. Application of the RTI-C model is discussed and a method utilizing two RTI's, one for the sensor element and the other for the detector body, is introduced. The method using two RTI's shows better results than the original RTI-C model, which is derived for predicting the response of sprinkler heads. In addition, a calculation method for predicting the response of rate-of-rise heat detector is presented. Overall performance of the prediction method is tested with experiments.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.645
Threshold uncertainty score0.514

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.214
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it