MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2588689804 · doi:10.2475/01.2017.02

The role and extent of dextral transpression and lateral escape on the post-Acadian tectonic evolution of south-central New England

2017· article· en· W2588689804 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Matthew A. Massey, David P. Moecher, Thomas B. Walker, T. O’Brien, L. Rohrer

Bibliographic record

VenueAmerican Journal of Science · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological and Geochemical Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSinistral and dextralGeologyTranspressionLineationMetamorphismZirconShear zoneGeochemistryMonazitePaleontologyGeochronologyStrain partitioningShear (geology)MyloniteSeismologyOrogenyGeomorphologyFault (geology)Tectonics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Bedrock mapping, structural analysis, documentation of kinematics and associated petrofabrics, and detailed zircon and monazite geochronology are the basis for a new interpretation of the post-Acadian tectonic evolution of southern New England. Early fabrics in the Central Maine Zone and eastern half of the Bronson Hill Zone are characterized by planar foliations, subhorizontal lineations, and dextral kinematic indicators. As transpression progressed, structures and fabrics reflected an increased component of shortening, marked by tightening of foliations, development of closed to isoclinal folds, localization of reverse high strain zones, steep dip-parallel lineations, and reverse top-to-east kinematic indicators. Syntectonic mineral assemblages show that cooling attended deformation, consistent with a component of vertical extrusion. In contrast, the western half of the Bronson Hill Zone is characterized by sinistral top-to-south deformation from Connecticut to New Hampshire, including two regional sinistral shear zones, and comprise the Western Bronson Hill Shear System. New zircon and monazite geochronology, along with previously published results, show that dextral transpression progressed continuously from ∼350 Ma to ∼295 Ma. Dextral transpression was initiated following ∼360 Ma to ∼355 Ma dioritic, tonalitic, and granitic magmatism. Sillimanite-grade reverse high strain zones developed by ∼330 Ma, while the presence of lower-grade fabrics, metamorphic zircon rims, and published hornblende cooling ages show deformation continued to at least ∼295 Ma in the eastern Bronson Hill and Central Maine. Sinistral top-to-south deformation in the Western Bronson Hill Shear System preceded ∼330 Ma to ∼300 Ma staurolite grade metamorphism, and syntectonic monazite and an abundance of published data show that deformation continued to ∼285 Ma. The conjugate shear zones were spatially and temporally linked, indicating that the dominant fabrics, structures, and mineral assemblages in bedrock exposures in this area of New England were driven by progressive dextral transpression and lateral escape in the Carboniferous, much younger than any previous tectonic reconstruction. This model can explain an assortment of enigmatic features in New England, including contrasting kinematics, differential exhumation of lithologies and lithotectonic zones, and the Pelham dome. These features are attributed to oblique convergence between Laurentian margin and Avalon/Meguma beginning in the Mississippian, rather than the Early to Middle Devonian Acadian orogeny as has long been proposed. The location between the New York promontory and the Quebec embayment could have provided the necessary geometry to focus deformation and lateral escape in New England, and shorten the orogen in this area by almost an order of magnitude.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.166
Threshold uncertainty score0.329

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.189
Teacher spread0.184 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations29
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAmerican Journal of ScienceSame topicGeological and Geochemical AnalysisFrench-language works237,207