Outdoor Performance and Stability of Boron Subphthalocyanines Applied as Electron Acceptors in Fullerene-Free Organic Photovoltaics
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The outdoor lifetime and performance of organic photovoltaics (OPVs) using boron subphthalocyanine (BsubPc) derivatives as electron-accepting materials is presented. The protocols followed are based on the most advanced level of outdoor testing established by the International Summit on OPV Stability (ISOS). The stability of each BsubPc is compared using three different sets of encapsulated planar heterojunction OPVs, with each set containing a different BsubPc as the electron-accepting layer. The performance and stability of each set is tested outdoors using an epoxy glue and a glass coverslip as protection from the ambient environment. Outdoor testing continued until the OPVs reached 80 or 50% of their original power conversion efficiency, as determined by frequent indoor characterization. OPVs utilizing chloro-BsubPc are shown to exhibit the highest stability and performance, while the stability of the other two BsubPc derivatives is reduced presumably as a result of their phenoxy or phenyl functionalization in the molecular axial positions. The established structure–property relationship and guidance for the design of future compounds for application in planar heterojunction OPVs are contrary to, and could not have been anticipated from, time zero laboratory testing.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".