MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2591588689 · doi:10.1109/memc.2016.7866253

IEEE Women in Engineering

2016· article· en· W2591588689 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Electromagnetic Compatibility Magazine · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicGender Diversity and Inequality
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTelecommunicationsEngineeringLibrary scienceEvent (particle physics)Political scienceComputer sciencePhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

During the 2016 IEEE International Symposium on EMC in Ottawa, Canada, the EMC Society Women in Engineering (WIE) liaison Irina Kasperovich continued the tradition of holding a WIE IEEE EMC Society event. This tradition was initiated at the 2015 Joint IEEE International Symposium on EMC and EMC Europe in Dresden, Germany by the president of the EMC Society, Dr. Frank Sabath. In addition to the luncheon meeting there was also the WIE table top promotional exhibit. The WIE exhibit was on display during the EMC Symposium week in the exhibit hall area. Elena Uchiteleva, who is the Regional Coordinator of IEEE WIE Region 7 (Canada) was promoting the WIE at the booth. Many people stopped by to inquire about WIE. All promotional items that were provided for the booth by WIE were taken by the end of the Symposium. The WIE also provided 800 WIE flyers that were inserted in the registration Symposium bags which were distributed to all the attendees.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.659
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.258
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it