MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2591738883 · doi:10.1111/ejss.12414

Effects of short‐term N addition on plant biomass allocation and C and N pools of the <i>Sibiraea angustata</i> scrub ecosystem

2017· article· en· W2591738883 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueEuropean Journal of Soil Science · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicSoil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
Canadian institutionsLakehead University
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsEcosystemShrubBiomass (ecology)ShrublandLitterAgronomyEnvironmental scienceNitrogenAnimal scienceBotanyChemistryEcologyBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Summary To explain the effects of short‐term N addition on plant biomass allocation and on carbon (C) and nitrogen (N) pools in an alpine scrub ecosystem, we carried out a field experiment in Sibiraea angustata scrubland on the eastern margin of the Qinghai‐Tibetan Plateau of China. After one and a half years of N addition at four rates (N 0 , control; N 20 , 20; N 50 , 50; N 100 , 100 kg N ha −1 year −1 ), we investigated the amount and allocation of biomass and the C and N pools in several parts of the ecosystem, including shrubs (leaves, shoots and branches, coarse roots and fine roots), grass (above‐ and below‐ground) and litter (wood and leaf debris) components, and seven depth intervals within the soil (0–5, 5–10, 10–20, 20–30, 30–50, 50–70 and 70–100 cm). The results were as follows: (i) total vegetation biomass showed a linear increase with the increase in N ( P &lt; 0.05), mainly from the increased root biomass in both shrubs and grasses, (ii) the ecosystem C and N storage were 36 and 3.26 kg m −2 , respectively, of which the shrub, grass, litter and soil components contributed 11.08, 0.47, 0.25 and 88%, respectively, to the C pool and 3.07, 0.16, 0.08 and 97%, respectively, to the N pool, (iii) the ecosystem N pool did not change in response to the addition of N, whereas the ecosystem C pool responded linearly to increasing N ( P &lt; 0.05). These results suggest that the alpine scrub ecosystem functions as a net C sink under increasing atmospheric N deposition, mainly by promoting belowground C sequestration. Highlights Effects of short‐term N addition on biomass allocation and C and N pools in alpine scrub. Response to N addition in C pool of components of the ecosystem and soil at depth (0–100 cm). Root:shoot ratio of vegetation and ecosystem C pool increased linearly with increasing N. Alpine scrub ecosystem may function as a net C sink under increasing atmospheric N deposition.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.882
Threshold uncertainty score0.208

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.207
Teacher spread0.193 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it