MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2591853747 · doi:10.1109/cjece.2016.2638962

New Systolic Array Architecture for Finite Field Inversion

2017· article· en· W2591853747 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Atef Ibrahim, Turki F. Al-Somani, Fayez Gebali

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicCoding theory and cryptography
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
FundersKing Abdulaziz City for Science and Technology
KeywordsArchitectureInversion (geology)RangingSystolic arrayApplication-specific integrated circuitPower consumptionComputer scienceEuclidean geometryFinite fieldParallel computingAlgorithmComputer engineeringPower (physics)MathematicsEmbedded systemDiscrete mathematicsTelecommunicationsVery-large-scale integrationGeometry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper proposes a new systolic array architecture to perform inversion operation in GF(2m) based on a previously modified extended Euclidean algorithm. This architecture has low area and power complexities and it achieves a moderate speed. This architecture is explored by applying a regular technique to the inversion algorithm. The systolic architecture obtained has simple structure with processing elements that have local communication with each other. ASIC implementation of the proposed design and comparable published designs shows that the proposed design saves more area (ranging from 14.1% to 63.4%) and saves more energy (ranging from 22.9% to 81.9%) over the compared efficient designs that makes it more suitable for resource-constrained embedded applications that impose more constraints on area and power consumption.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.183
Teacher spread0.176 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations30
Published2017
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Electrical and Computer EngineeringSame topicCoding theory and cryptographyFrench-language works237,207