L’impossible rencontre : nationalistes irlandais et républicains français dans la première moitié du XIXe siècle
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Le premier dix-neuvième siècle n’est guère favorable aux idées républicaines, en France comme en Irlande. Sur l’île, la dynamique s’est éteinte, mais les références au « moment républicain » de la fin du XVIIIe siècle emplissent les discours des nationalistes. Daniel O’Connell trace les contours de son projet politique à l’aune des dernières décennies du XVIIIe siècle, entre admiration pour le « Parlement de Grattan » (1782), son modèle, et condamnation des « hommes de 98 » qui lui servent de repoussoir. En dépit de l’hostilité affichée par O’Connell, les républicains français lui vouent une profonde admiration au milieu des années 1830. L’histoire de cette illusion permet de mesurer la distance séparant deux entreprises politiques qui ont pourtant en commun de revendiquer la souveraineté populaire. En 1848, après la révolution de Février, l’idéal républicain retrouve quelques couleurs en Irlande, mais le Gouvernement Provisoire reste sourd aux appels des nationalistes irlandais.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.019 | 0.010 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".