Projets identitaires parentaux des couples mixtes au Québec et au Maroc. Similitudes et effets du contexte national
Bibliographic record
Abstract
L’article a pour objectif d’examiner l’impact du contexte national sur la mixité conjugale et plus spécifiquement sur les processus de transmission identitaire à travers une comparaison du contexte marocain et du contexte québécois. Il s’appuie sur des travaux ethnographiques qui se sont intéressés aux projets identitaires parentaux d’individus engagés dans des expériences de mixité conjugale. Une telle comparaison entre deux contextes très différents (le Québec étant une société laïque et d’immigration et le Maroc un pays musulman et d’émigration) fait ressortir les différences et les similitudes dans les processus de transmission identitaires des couples mixtes. L’effet du contexte ne concerne pas tant les projets identitaires en tant que tels que leur déploiement. Dans les deux pays, les familles mixtes vivent leur projet familial en non-conformité avec le modèle social majoritaire.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.011 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.010 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".