MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2593343515 · doi:10.1177/030630701404000105

Graduate Entrepreneurship and Career Initiation in the ‘New Era’ Economy

2014· article· en· W2593343515 on OpenAlexaff
David Rae

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of General Management · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicHigher Education and Employability
Canadian institutionsCape Breton University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEmployabilityEntrepreneurshipContext (archaeology)Graduate educationGraduate studentsPeriod (music)Political scienceCareer developmentFinancial crisisEconomic growthEconomicsSociologyPedagogyGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The aim of this article is to explore graduate entrepreneurship and career-making in the period of stagnant economic growth in the UK over the six years from the financial crisis of 2008 to the present day. In the context of a challenging economy, this period has seen a strong emphasis on graduate employability and education for entrepreneurship within Higher Education, both within the United Kingdom and at international levels. The prevailing employment market offered depressed levels of demand and constrained graduate career opportunities, with signs of recent recovery. The article reflects on six years' experience of this ‘New Era’, drawing on labour market research and projections, and summarises the challenges and responses in graduate enterprise and employability applicable to the post-2008 economy. Finally, it offers practical options for institutional policies, enterprise education and individual actions, centering on graduate career development.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.022

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.006
Scholarly communication0.0070.004
Open science0.0000.006
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.067
GPT teacher head0.325
Teacher spread0.258 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations20
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of General ManagementSame topicHigher Education and EmployabilityFrench-language works237,207