MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2593707724 · doi:10.1002/cc.20236

Editors’ Notes

2017· article· en· W2593707724 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueNew Directions for Community Colleges · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicDisability Education and Employment
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCitationLibrary scienceMedia studiesComputer scienceSociology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The concept of community colleges has existed for more than a century in United States.The mission of these institutions is centered on access to postsecondary education that focuses on the needs of the community in which they are located.The opportunities available include general education coursework leading to an associate of arts degree, vocational training that culminates with an associate of science degree, and continuing education.For a high percentage of students entering the community college system, the ability to transfer credits to a university and obtain a baccalaureate degree serves as a motivating factor and the fulfillment of the promise for equality through access to a higher education.The success of this model has garnered international attention from countries such as Canada, Chile, China, South Korea, India, South Africa, Turkey, and New Zealand, to name a few.The need for a highly skilled and well-educated workforce is a common theme.Additionally, the internationalization of community colleges in United States, through the expansion of academic programs, continues to gain momentum.Within the context of North America, the United States and Canada are highlighted in this volume.In Chapter 1, Chase-Mayoral suggests the need for institutions founded on the educational, economic, and social needs of a community to also consider how the spirit of educational entrepreneurialism plays a role.She hypothesizes that this concept is a prerequisite for a community to develop the idea of establishing and sustaining these types of institutions.Furthering this idea, Sianos discusses why Ontario' s Differentiation Policy Framework for Postsecondary Education was developed and its impact on Ontario' s postsecondary system.This framework was designed as a response to the need for a highly skilled workforce; however, it is believed that this system encourages elitist reform.The focus of Chapter 3 is South America.Through the lens of organizational learning theory, McCrink and Whitford describe the outcomes of a partnership between a community college in the United States and a university in Chile to develop a community college system in Chile.Chapters 4 through 6 focus on the continent of Asia, specifically China, South Korea, and India.The development of community college-like institutions in China began as recently as the 1980s.Zhang posits identity, applicability, structure, and global impact as challenges these institutions are experiencing.Kim and Yun explore persistence within 2-year colleges as it relates to career decision making self-efficacy, academic satisfaction, and

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.775
Threshold uncertainty score0.989

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0120.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.109
GPT teacher head0.406
Teacher spread0.297 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it