MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2594162078

Schulze D.G., Stucki J.W. & Bertsch P.M. CMS Workshop Lectures, Volume 9: Synchrotron X-ray Methods in Clay Science.The Clay Minerals Society, PO Box 4416, Boulder, Colorado 80306, USA, 1999. vii + 244 pp. Price: US $23. ISBN: 1-881208-09-5.

2000· article· en· W2594162078 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueClay Minerals · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicClay minerals and soil interactions
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhysicsNuclear physicsElectronEngineering physicsSynchrotron radiation
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This is another volume in the excellent-value paperback series produced by the US society. The source material for the book was derived from lectures given at the workshop of the same title given in conjunction with the 11th International Clay Conference held in Ottawa, Canada in 1997. Whenever charged particles are accelerated they emit electromagnetic radiation, and it has long been possible to obtain very intense fluxes of X-rays from synchrotrons. These are large machines into which electrons or their positively charged counterparts, positrons, are injected into a beam and then accelerated around ring-shaped paths to near the speed of light using bending magnets. However, these machines were built originally to perform high-energy physics experiments on the fundamental structure of matter, and the production of X-rays and other electromagnetic waves was regarded as merely junk, parasitic noise to be overcome. However, crystallographers eventually caught on to the fact that these machines could produce X-ray fluxes many orders of magnitude higher than the tubes of conventional laboratory diffractometers. One further major difference between …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.551
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.004
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0030.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0150.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.343
Teacher spread0.313 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it