MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2594185020 · doi:10.1145/3025171.3025187

Pupillometry and Head Distance to the Screen to Predict Skill Acquisition During Information Visualization Tasks

2017· article· en· W2594185020 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicIntelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer sciencePupillary responseVisualizationGazePupillometryEye trackingHuman–computer interactionArtificial intelligenceData visualizationPupil

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper we investigate using a variety of behavioral measures collectible with an eye tracker to predict a user's skill acquisition phase while performing various information visualization tasks with bar graphs. Our long term goal is to use this information in real-time to create user-adaptive visualizations that can provide personalized support to facilitate visualization processing based on the user's predicted skill level. We show that leveraging two additional content-independent data sources, namely information on a user's pupil dilation and head distance to the screen, yields a significant improvement for predictive accuracies of skill acquisition compared to predictions made using content-dependent information related to user eye gaze attention patterns, as was done in previous work. We show that including features from both pupil dilation and head distance to the screen improve the ability to predict users' skill acquisition state, beating both the baseline and a model using only content-dependent gaze information.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.875
Threshold uncertainty score0.936

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.276
Teacher spread0.263 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it