MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2595139730

Settler: Identity and Colonialism in 21st Century Canada

2016· article· en· W2595139730 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian journal of native studies · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicIndigenous Studies and Ecology
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIndigenousColonialismPoliticsSovereigntyDecolonizationIdentity (music)SociologyRacismPolitical scienceEnvironmental ethicsLawGender studiesAesthetics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Emma Battell Lowman and Adam J. Barker, Settler: Identity and Colonialism in 2V Century Canada. Winnipeg: Femwood Publishing, 2015.160 pages. ISBN 9781552667781. $18.95 paperback.In Settler: Identity and Colonialism in 21s1 Century Canada, Lowman and Barker have provided a richly-nuanced example of the importance of ontology and epistemology. Though this is not their aim, these difficult-to-teach concepts are at the core of this slim book and the difficult questions raises for, as they write, How we think about the world and our place in change as part of our efforts to change our material conditions and cultural conditioning (p. 19). They argue that we are all settlers if we are not Indigenous, even those among us who are sympathetic to Indigenous positions. From the outset, the authors explain that they want non Indigenous to identify as Canadians as the first step to beginning the transformative process needed to decolonize Canada and support Indigenous resurgence. They warn us, however, the process will be never ending and, at times, uncomfortable.Though Canada has shown some acknowledgement of our colonial past and its painful consequences for Indigenous peoples, continues as evidenced by pressures on Indigenous nations' land base, racism, violence, discrimination by social services, political disempowerment and policies aimed at assimilation. Colonialism continues because it is the country's land base itself that has been and continues to be the target of colonial power (p. 3). Against a backdrop of Canada's questioned legal claims to sovereignty and political authority over land, Indigenous blockades, protests and acts of civil disobedience must all be understood as acts of resistance against the ongoing efforts of Settler Canada... to eliminate Indigenous peoples' claims to the land and permanently settle the land question (p. 3).The authors maintain that all non Indigenous are complicit through the ideologies, discourses, and practices that we engage in. Traditional discourses present Indigenous tribes as primitive; their replacement by more advanced migrant cultures, inevitable. More liberal discourse presents Canada as a multicultural country in which Indigenous peoples deserve special rights because they were a founding nation of the state but who, ultimately be subsumed within the Canadian state. These discourses allow us to engage in what the authors accept as settler colonialism - not the establishment of colonies in distant lands, but against peoples within its borders. Settler is expressed through the continuation of social, economic and political of invasion such as our notions of private property that, bolstered by racism, ultimately lead to laws that justify Indigenous peoples' loss of land. The authors argue that whether we are descended from early settlers or slaves, or whether we are newly arrived immigrants or refugees, we are settlers if we are not Indigenous - we all benefit from the colonial structures and practices that displace Indigenous peoples from their lands.Particularly helpful is the authors' analysis of positions on Indigenous issues among the progressive left that the authors bring together. Even those who are anti-capitalist and sympathetic often miss the point. Racism, class, and neoliberalism unquestionably contribute to oppression of many groups, but the relationship of Indigenous peoples to their lands is unique and profound; results in a particular world view or ontology that is place-based. …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.330
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.054
GPT teacher head0.379
Teacher spread0.325 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it