Violence by Children Against Mothers in Relation to Violence Between Parents and Corporal Punishment by Parents
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This article examines violence by children against parents, with particular emphasis on violence against mothers. The data are from interviews with parents of a nationally representative sample of American children age 3 through 17 (N=l,023). Analyses of rates for the previous 12 months found that: (1) The younger the child, the higher the rate of child-to-parent violence (CPV). (2) At all ages, more children were violent to mothers than to fathers. (3) Both boys and girls hit mothers more than fathers. (4) At all ages, slightly more boys than girls hit parents. Tests of the theory that CPV reflects violence by the parents found that CPV was associated with violence by parents, regardless of whether the violence was husband- to-wife, wife-to-husband, corporal punishment, or physical abuse. In the absence of parent-to- child violence, CPV is rare. Because corporal punishment had the strongest relation to CPV, the findings suggest that steps to end violence against women cannot be limited to efforts to eliminate wife-beating, but should also include steps to end corporal punishment. Primary prevention is needed in the form of helping parents set an example of non-violence by not using corporal punishment.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it