Sites et Lieux de mémoire: les cybermigrances de Régine Robin
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
From Berlin-Chantiers, Regine Robin’s fictional writing puts apart the memorial romance of subaltern subjects in favor of a tough and lonely discourse. The narrative scenarios which Robin proposes in “Cybermigrances” and “L'immense fatigue des pierres” are much closer to one of Gibson's “Neuromancer” than the “Madeleine” of Proust. Should we regret the time of analog memory, important to Apollinaire, considering the preference for scientific-fictional timelessness of the digital world? Although this writer nourishes an explicit fascination with nuclei and ramifications of web, L'immense fatigue des pierres is not limited to such device. Regine Robin gives us a detailed reflection on the widespread catatonic of our contemporary spaces, evidenced by the numerous descriptions of Berlim in his most “representation” of Berlin is the tortured palimpsest. Considering the impossible mourning for the missing of the Shoah, it is necessary to “build” (in Thomas Bernhard’ words in “Corrections”), before the web screen that brings the subject to his loneliness, a site for the living ruins. --- Original in French.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it