Parallel fully coupled Schwarz preconditioners for saddle point problems.
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We study some parallel overlapping Schwarz preconditioners for solving Stokeslike problems arising from finite element discretization of incompressible flow problems. Most of the existing methods are based on the splitting of the velocity and pressure variables. With the splitting, fast solution methods are often constructed using various fast Poisson solvers for one of the variables. More recently, several papers have investigated the so-called fully coupled approaches in which the variables are not separated. The fully coupled approach has some advantages over the variable splitting method when solving Stokes-like equations with many variables, where a good splitting may be hard to obtain. In this paper we systematically study the parallel scalability of several versions of the fully coupled Schwarz method for both symmetric and nonsymmetric Stokeslike problems. We show numerically that the performance of a two-level method with a multiplicative iterative coarse solver is superior to the other variants of Schwarz preconditioners.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it