MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2598902734

Decolonizing of the Nursing Academy

2016· article· en· W2598902734 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Brenda Green

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian journal of native studies · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicService-Learning and Community Engagement
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIndigenousColonialismPresumptionGraduation (instrument)SociologyFace (sociological concept)Political scienceStatus quoNursingPedagogyMedicinePsychologyLawSocial science
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Given the history of colonialism, assimilation, and quality of life, and westernization of health care, many Canadian Indigenous1 students may not conform to conventional institutional norms within nursing education as the profession of nursing is based in a colonial system of values. The historical roots of nursing in North America can be found in a scientific treatment approach with the goal of maintaining the status quo of helping the individual to better fit into his/her environment (Huff, 2002) and therefore most solutions developed by institutions to address the lack of Indigenous student success are based on the presumption that something is lacking within the student. This perspective is inherently one imbedded in colonialistic assumptions that are founded on a victim blaming mentality.Indigenous students face numerous barriers upon leaving their communities and attending postsecondary institutions. Many Indigenous students are ill-prepared to succeed at university, resulting in graduation rates at post-secondary schools well below those of nonIndigenous peoples. Accessibility and affordability present difficulties, and throughout university the students often face racism and discrimination from peers, professors and administration. Altogether too frequently, these and other factors prove to be too great a barrier to overcome and result in students dropping out (Timmons, et al. 2009, p. 4).This paper explores the experiences of two nurse-educators as they support and promote Indigenous pedagogy and its underlying epistemology by utilizing Kirkness and Barnhardt's (1991) perspective of respect, relevance, and responsibility. These terms are used to reflect the deeper purpose of education as envisioned by Indigenous people and to propose actions that can and should be implemented to produce anti-oppressive outcomes in nursing education. From this perspective, Indigenous nursing students may benefit from a contextual learning model that respects them for who they are, that is relevant to their view of the world, that offers reciprocity in their relationships with others, and that helps them exercise responsibility over their own lives (Kirkness & Barnhardt, 1991. p. 1).ISSUES AFFECTING INDIGENOUS STUDENTS' COMPLETION OF NURSING EDUCATIONTwo nations of people (Western and Indigenous) make up a symbiotic and allied relationship in Canada. However, this relationship has been challenged by colonialistic actions and attitudes that are directed towards Indigenous people. These actions have been deliberate and calculated; and designed to displace and distance Indigenous people from their land, culture and resources and to maintain an obligatory relationship between the two nations.While socio-economic factors such as poverty and unemployment put them at an obvious disadvantage, Indigenous students also face more subtle barriers such as discrimination, low self concept and institutional insensitivity to Indigenous cultures (Council of Ministers of Education, Canada, 2002). Many Indigenous students arrive in post- secondary institutions without adequate high school preparation; others struggle to balance education with family responsibilities. Postsecondary educational programs have provided little in the way to minimize the effects of colonialism or to provide a hospitable environment to attract and retain Indigenous students. Combined with history of forced assimilation through educational institutions, the barriers to Indigenous participation in post-secondary education is formidable. (Malatest, 2004).The obliteration of Indigenous culture was one strategy in which to promote ongoing colonistic ideals in academia. Typical solutions that emanate from this blame-the-victim perspective are special counseling and advising centers, bridging and developmental programs, tutorials, and an array of additional student support services, all of which are intended to help problem students successfully partake of what the university has to offer. …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.989
Threshold uncertainty score0.079

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0140.014
Scholarly communication0.0080.004
Open science0.0010.014
Research integrity0.0020.006
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0150.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.150
GPT teacher head0.408
Teacher spread0.258 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2016
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian journal of native studiesSame topicService-Learning and Community EngagementFrench-language works237,207