Bibliographic record
Abstract
Il s’agira dans cet article d’analyser la représentation du corps féminin noir, notamment dans la musique rap. Il sera particulièrement question des rappeuses et de l’exposition du corps des femmes (celles que l’on appelle les « video girls ») dans les vidéoclips de rap aussi bien aux États-Unis qu’en France, en soulignant toutefois les similitudes et les différences. Dans le contexte socio-historique du rap français vient en effet s’ajouter — à côté de la représentation du corps noir — une autre figure : celle de la « Maghrébine » particulièrement apparente dans un autre type de musique qui a connu la même expérience de réappropriation de la culture musicale africaine-américaine par une jeunesse postcoloniale en France, à savoir le R&B. Comment ces deux figures révèlent deux dimensions hétéro-normatives et antagonistes de la féminité ? Comment à travers ce dispositif (des techniques qui s’articulent ensemble et jouent ensemble) sont exprimées des normes de genre racisées qui participent de la construction identitaire de tous les groupes ?
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.007 | 0.013 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.009 | 0.009 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.004 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.022 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".