MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2601855653 · doi:10.2527/asasmw.2017.12.208

208 The interactive effects of a matrix coated organic acids blend and antibiotic supplementation in growing pigs

2017· article· en· W2601855653 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Animal Science · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicBiopolymer Synthesis and Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAntibioticsFood scienceMatrix (chemical analysis)ChemistryAnimal scienceBiologyBiochemistryChromatography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Dietary addition of organic acids can promote nutrient digestibility, growth performance, and gut health outcomes in pigs. Thus, we investigated the effect of supplementing a matrix coated organic acids blend (MCOA) without or with antimicrobial growth promoters (AGP) in growing pig diets on growth performance, hematological profiles, diarrhea score, and in vitro fecal noxious gas emission. Ninety-six growing pigs [(Yorkshire × Landrace) × Duroc] with an average BW of 47.71 ± 1.15 kg (mean ± SD) were used in a 6-wk experiment. Based on initial BW and gender, pigs were randomly blocked and allocated to 1 of 4 experimental treatments each with 12 replicates and 2 pigs per pen. Pigs were allotted to diets containing 0 or 0.2% MCOA, and 0 or 0.25% AGP (aureomycin, Aureo S-P 250 G) according to a 2 × 2 factorial arrangement of treatments. For hematology and serum urea N (SUN) measurements, 1 pig from each pen was randomly selected, and blood samples (10 mL per pig) were collected via jugular vein puncture on d 41. The occurrence and severity of diarrhea were monitored and assessed during the whole experiment. All data were statistically analyzed using the PROC MIXED procedure of SAS. Pigs fed the diet supplemented with MCOA had higher feed efficiency (G:F) than those fed the diets without MCOA (0.38 vs. 0.36; P = 0.030). Moreover, AGP × MCOA supplementation tended to have higher G:F (P = 0.083). However, pigs fed AGP × MCOA diet had reduced SUN (P = 0.024). Diarrhea score was not affected (P > 0.10) by dietary AGP or MCOA. Pigs fed diet supplemented with AGP had reduced fecal ammonia (NH3) gas emission compared to those fed without AGP (8.49 vs. 8.80 ppm; P = 0.037). Moreover, pigs fed diet supplemented with MCOA had reduced fecal NH3 and acetic acid gas emission compared to those fed without MCOA (8.36 vs. 8.93 ppm, and 1.73 vs. 2.79 ppm; P < 0.001, and P = 0.048, respectively). In conclusion, growing pigs fed diets supplemented with MCOA had improved G:F and similar beneficial responses as those fed diets with AGP in terms of reducing serum urea N, and in vitro noxious gas emission. This suggests that supplementation of MOCA can promote G:F of growing pigs in antibiotic-free-feeding regimens.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.189
Threshold uncertainty score0.114

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.302
Teacher spread0.295 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it