Viscoelastic resonant responses of shear deformable imperfect microbeams
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A viscoelastic model for the nonlinear analysis of the coupled transverse, longitudinal, and rotational oscillations of an imperfect shear deformable microbeam is developed, for the first time, based on the modified couple stress theory. An energy dissipation mechanism is developed via use of the Kelvin–Voigt internal energy dissipation mechanism. For the stress and deviatoric part of the symmetric couple stress tensors, the viscous components along with the corresponding work terms are obtained. The size-dependent elastic energy along with the kinetic energy of the viscoelastic microsystem is formulated in terms of the displacement field together with system geometric and physical parameters. The internal energy dissipation is developed via the work done by the viscous components of the stress and the deviatoric part of the symmetric couple stress tensors by means of the Kelvin–Voigt mechanism. These work and energy terms are inserted into Hamilton’s principle together with the work due to an external force in order to obtain three viscoelastically coupled equations governing the transverse, longitudinal, and rotational motions with cubic and quadratic nonlinear terms. A high-dimensional Galerkin approximation method is applied for all the three equations, yielding three sets of second-order coupled ordinary differential equations with cubic and quadratic nonlinearities. Upon application of a transformation, a continuation technique along with the backward differentiation formula (BDF) is employed in order to obtain the time-variant response of the system subject to a harmonic load. Special attention is paid to the effect of the Kelvin–Voigt type viscoelasticity on the system response in the presence of the length-scale parameter.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".