A Video Bitrate Adaptation and Prediction Mechanism for HTTP Adaptive Streaming
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP) Adaptive Streaming (HAS) has now become ubiquitous and accounts for a large amount of video delivery over the Internet. But since the Internet is prone to bandwidth variations, HAS's up and down switching between different video bitrates to keep up with bandwidth variations leads to a reduction in Quality of Experience (QoE). In this article, we propose a video bitrate adaptation and prediction mechanism based on Fuzzy logic for HAS players, which takes into consideration the estimate of available network bandwidth as well as the predicted buffer occupancy level in order to proactively and intelligently respond to current conditions. This leads to two contributions: First, it allows HAS players to take appropriate actions, sooner than existing methods, to prevent playback interruptions caused by buffer underrun, reducing the ON-OFF traffic phenomena associated with current approaches and increasing the QoE. Second, it facilitates fair sharing of bandwidth among competing players at the bottleneck link. We present the implementation of our proposed mechanism and provide both empirical/QoE analysis and performance comparison with existing work. Our results show that, compared to existing systems, our system has (1) better fairness among multiple competing players by almost 50% on average and as much as 80% as indicated by Jain's fairness index and (2) better perceived quality of video by almost 8% on average and as much as 17%, according to the estimate the Mean Opinion Score (eMOS) model.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".