MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2603913950 · doi:10.1386/public.27.54.98_1

Arctic Cultural (Mis)Representation: Advocacy, Activism, and Artistic Expression on Social Media

2016· article· en· W2603913950 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenuePublic · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicIndigenous Studies and Ecology
Canadian institutionsYork University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRepresentation (politics)NarrativeArcticThe InternetThe arcticSocial mediaBroadbandExpression (computer science)Media studiesSociologyPolitical scienceArtComputer scienceWorld Wide WebEcologyLawPoliticsLiterature

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The history of Canadian arctic culture has been predominantly informed through the work of non-Inuit anthropologists, academics, art dealers, curators, and collectors. A continuous cycle of restricted access has led to sustained discriminatory and misinformed representation of arctic life and culture in the media. Although broadband is opening the information highway, as long as restricted northern internet access remains, southern systems of control over Inuit voice and representation will be maintained. Through modern telecommunication technologies, social networking has become an important medium for Inuit self-representation, artistic expression, community advocacy, and activism in a historical narrative that has been dominated by a westernized, southern voice.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.545
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0030.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.123
GPT teacher head0.410
Teacher spread0.288 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it