MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2604453058 · doi:10.1002/oca.2320

Control‐relevant parameter estimation application to a model‐based PHEV power management system

2017· article· en· W2604453058 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueOptimal Control Applications and Methods · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicElectric and Hybrid Vehicle Technologies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsPowertrainModel predictive controlController (irrigation)Control engineeringPower managementComputer scienceAutomotive industryControl (management)Control theory (sociology)Power (physics)EngineeringTorqueArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Summary Explicit model predictive control approach is a promising approach to fulfill automotive real‐time controls requirements. A key factor in the performance and real‐time capabilities of a predictive model‐based controller is the accuracy of the control‐oriented model. The control‐oriented model should capture the essential dynamics of the real plant and be adequately simple to make the controller implementable on a commercial hardware with limited memory and computational capabilities. In this study, control‐relevant parameter estimation is used to find a control‐oriented model for a real‐time predictive power management system for a plug‐in hybrid powertrain. Simulations, which are conducted using an equation‐based model of the powertrain, demonstrate a significant improvement of the power management system performance by improving the control‐oriented model with no effect on real‐time capabilities of the controller.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.617
Threshold uncertainty score0.771

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.296
Teacher spread0.287 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it