MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2604879839 · doi:10.1061/9780784480410.018

Cast Steel Replaceable Modular Links for Eccentrically Braced Frames

2017· article· en· W2604879839 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueStructures Congress 2017 · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicStructural Load-Bearing Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsStructural engineeringBeam (structure)BucklingBraced frameEngineeringSteel frameSeismic analysisModular designFrame (networking)Computer scienceMechanical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents an investigation into the use of cast steel replaceable links for eccentrically braced frames (EBFs). While conventional EBFs can be designed with a large response modification factor, and are thus very economical seismic-force-resisting systems (SFRS) in high-seismic regions, they can also be prone to damage states such as fracture at stiffener welds, local buckling, and lateral torsional buckling. They are also difficult to repair after an earthquake event since the EBF links are integrated into the floor beam of the seismic force-resisting frame. It is proposed that these drawbacks of conventional EBFs could be mitigated by using replaceable cast steel yielding links, since demand critical welds are avoided and damaged links can be replaced after an earthquake. Additionally, the cast steel EBF links are uncoupled from the beam sections and thus the most economical beam and link can both be specified. This paper presents sample building designs for a variety of building locations, using a newly developed cast steel EBF link concept that can be used to achieve more economical designs while also improving the performance of EBF frames.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.143
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.269
Teacher spread0.250 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it