Applications and Limitations of Single-Phase Models to the Description of the Rapid Filling Pipe Problem
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The study of the hydraulic behavior of stormwater sewers during intense rain events is motivated by operational problems associated with this rapid filling process they experience. As is well known, intense rain events may trigger the occurrence of pipe-filling bores, which causes flow regime transition between free-surface and pressurized flows and also expulsion of the air within the pipes. In some cases, these bores cause problems such as structural damages to the drainage system and geysering through manholes. Various approaches to promote the numerical simulation of the flow regime transition are available, and some of them incorporate the effects of the air phase within the pipes. In most cases, the modeling of the air phase dynamics is simplified, improving only the calculation of the bore speed changes due to the air pressurization. However, experimental investigations promoted by Vasconcelos and Wright (2004a) demonstrated that the effects of the air pressurization are not limited only to the bore propagation but also contribute to other changes in the flow behavior. In cases when the venting conditions are too limited, the single phase flow approach to modeling system behavior may be insufficient. This work aims to explore the applicability limits of single-phase numerical models for the rapid filling pipe problem using a simplified treatment for the air phase. The numeric code solves the Saint-Venant equations with the Preissmann slot using a finite volume procedure able to capture shocks with minimum numerical diffusion. Air phase
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it