MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W260662615

Elizabeth Bishop: Nova Scotia in Brazil

2001· article· en· W260662615 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Steven Gould Axelrod

Bibliographic record

VenuePapers on Language & Literature · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicPoetry Analysis and Criticism
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNova scotiaHistoryPoetryNova (rocket)HumanitiesEthnologyArt historyArtLiterature
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Elizabeth Bishop lived Brazil more or less continuously from 1951 to 1966 and then intermittently to 1971. The country functioned as a necessary escape from deprived and anxious world her early Nova Scotia and Massachusetts. Yet her new life was haunted by her past. Although Brazil permitted her to think, to feel, and to experience ways that were novel for her, that very difference impelled her to reapproach old, to release from repression some memories that had seemed too painful to face North America. Moreover, Brazil represented a restoration comfort she had experienced only fleetingly as a child. The country therefore assumed a complex symbiotic relationship Bishop's imagination with its climatic, cultural, and psychological opposite, North Atlantic. In Brazil, Bishop began to construct, for virtually first time, literary texts that evoked scenes from her Nova Scotian past. Her physical journey south initiated a parallel aesthetic journey north. Although Bishop had alluded to Nova Scotia a handful texts written prior to her arrival Rio de Janeiro on November 30, 1951,[1] she recurrently and times obsessively reconstructed Nova Scotian landscape and memory texts written over next twenty years Brazil. These include some her most intense stories and poems. In tropical Rio Bishop found that summer mildew magically transformed itself into mildew books and old papers and old memories, and that such an atmosphere her long-lost Neddy might suddenly be here (Memories Uncle Neddy, Collected Prose 228-29). From places like Petropolis and Ouro Preto she could assert Nova Scotia so convincingly that we feel too: Heavens, I recognize place, I know it (Poem, Complete Poems 176). Freud argued that homelike and unhomelike have an eerie tendency to include each other (The 'Uncanny' 224-26). In Bishop's texts far and near similarly intertwine what Thomas Travisano has aptly termed the homely exoticism childhood (168). For home was never closer, never more familiar, and never more strange than Brazil. If Bishop's stay Brazil was colored by her Nova Scotian memories, memories were equally informed by ambiguities her Brazilian experience. Just as she was somewhat remote as a visitor Brazil, reluctant to speak Portuguese and to mingle with others (Fountain and Brazeau 178-79), so she was remote as a traveler to her Nova Scotian past, skittish about people, events, motives, and emotions. She wished to conduct her journey back into her psychic landscape as though behind a thick transparent pane, so that she might not see too much or feel too intensely. Renee Curry has suggested that Bishop wished to be in but not of Brazil,[2] and a similar way Bishop wished to visit past only on certain conditions mastery and safety. She maintained an almost Hemingwayesque reserve. She wanted to protect her present self--gifted, fragile, and egotistical--against encroachment all environments, geographical or recollected. Although might be argued that Bishop's lack intimacy with Brazil and its people reflected a late colonial strategy, must be noted that she withheld herself from her own personal past a very similar way. Homi Bhabha has stated that object colonial discourse is at once an object desire and derision, arising part out both phobia and fetish (67, 72). Bishop effect colonized her past, much as she attempted to colonize and to control her present. Her colonizing urge had less to do with nationality than with opportunity; was her acquired and habitual method to secure a self that was perpetually threatening to unravel. Although we can easily see that she made remembered people, places, and events into objects desire, phobia, and fetish, we may find more difficult to detect derision. …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.312
Threshold uncertainty score0.628

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0060.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0140.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.253
Teacher spread0.243 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePapers on Language & LiteratureSame topicPoetry Analysis and CriticismFrench-language works237,207