MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Radon progeny in Ontario’s non-uranium underground mines

2014· article· en· W2607456693 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueDeep mining · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicRadioactivity and Radon Measurements
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsUranium mineRadonUraniumMining engineeringEnvironmental scienceGeologyMetallurgyMaterials sciencePhysicsNuclear physics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Studies have linked long-term inhalation of radon progeny or radon daughters with adverse health effects such as lung cancer. Although the risk is very low when radon is diluted to extremely low concentrations in the open, radon in underground mines can accumulate up to dangerous concentrations and may cause substantial health damage after long-term exposure. Radon can be found in certain types of geology, such as granite and volcanic soils, as well as aluminous shales. Likewise, low concentrations of this gas can be expected in sedimentary rocks. In October 1988, Ontario’s Mining Legislative Review Committee (MLRC) approved regulation to control the higher levels of radon progeny found in some of the non-uranium mines. Several sections (287 to 293) were amended to Regulation 854 (Ministry of Labour 2012). In sections 287 to 293, ‘radon daughters’ means polonium-218 (RaA), lead-214 (RaB), bismuth-214 (RaC) and polonium-214 (RaC’). The unit of radon daughter concentration is expressed in working level (WL) or working level month (WLM). The maximum allowable exposure each month for one year to maintain annual exposures below 1 WLM is 0.083 WL and the ceiling concentration is 0.33 WL. Section 289 describes air sampling protocols for radon daughters. This paper presents the results of radon assessments conducted from 2004-2012 at various locations in 28 Ontario’s non-uranium underground mines. A total of 325 measurements were conducted and results indicated that radon progeny concentrations measured ranged from 0.000-0.070 WL. These were all below the maximum allowable exposure each month for one year of 0.083 WL to maintain annual exposure of 1 WLM; 97% of the measurements were within 0.000-0.030 WL, 2% were within 0.031-0.060 WL, and 1% was within 0.061-0.10 (or 0.070) WL. At these concentrations, actions that have to be conducted by the non-uranium underground mines range from annual assessment by a competent person (<0.03 WL), annual sampling of workplaces (0.031-0.06 WL), and quarterly sampling of workplaces (0.061-0.10 WL). Maintaining good ventilation in Ontario’s non-uranium underground mines may have contributed to the generally low radon progeny concentration levels measured from 2004-2012.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.438
Threshold uncertainty score0.995

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.075
GPT teacher head0.354
Teacher spread0.280 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it