MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Carnaval, uma festa democrática? Discussão sobre segregação social e o direito à cidade a partir do universo carnavalesco do Rio de Janeiro.

2016· article· pt· W2607759500 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenuePragMATIZES - Revista Latino-Americana de Estudos em Cultura · 2016
Typearticle
Languagept
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicArts and Performance Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

O objetivo deste artigo é discutir o carnaval carioca enquanto uma festa urbana nacional, um patrimônio imaterial e uma política pública que aciona identidades sociais e se contrói e reconstrói da medida em que o Brasil e a cidade do Rio de Janeiro se transformam. O texto inicia sua discussão partindo da premissa que ritual carnavalesco das escolas de samba se constitui em um universo urbano que engendra relações entre o poder público e as camadas populares para à posteriori discutir os processos de segregação urbana ligados à construção de uma identidade nacional. Por fim, o artigo busca refletir sobre as múltiplas dimensões de poder dadas num processo de oficialização e patrimonialização de uma festa, bem como, os intensos processos de negociação e agência intrínsecos das relações entre poder público e as camadas populares que vivenciam cotidianamente o carnaval há gerações.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.652
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0040.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.262
Teacher spread0.239 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it