MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2608354854 · doi:10.1353/mln.2017.0042

The Epic of Juan Latino. Dilemmas of Race and Religion in Renaissance Spain by Elizabeth R. Wright

2017· article· en· W2608354854 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
John J. Allen

Bibliographic record

VenueMLN · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicLatin American history and culture
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWrightPortraitEPICRace (biology)Art historyWhite (mutation)ArtPoetryHistoryClassicsSociologyLiteratureGender studies

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Reviewed by: The Epic of Juan Latino. Dilemmas of Race and Religion in Renaissance Spain by Elizabeth R. Wright John J. Allen Elizabeth R. Wright, The Epic of Juan Latino. Dilemmas of Race and Religion in Renaissance Spain. No. 22 in the Toronto Iberic series. U of Toronto P, 2016. 288 pp. The extensive list of helpers, interpreters, contacts, and sources involved in Wright's impressive acknowledgments prepares us for the unusual thoroughness of the study she has produced. The book opens with "A Lost Portrait and a Forgotten Name," introducing us to the free black Christian poet Juan Latino, about whom very little is actually known. The picture on the book jacket is not our subject, but Durer's "Portrait Study of a Black Man," and we do not know when or how Latino was freed, or anything about his ancestry or birth date. We do learn that he managed to buy a home, hire servants, and invest a significant amount of money, all of which was made possible by the third Duke of Sessa, who provided for his education. The first duke of Sessa was the "gran capitán," Gonzalo Fernández de Córdoba; Latino was the duke's grandson's slave. The study is organized in two Parts, one of biographical analysis and elucidation of the historical background for the creation of his epic, in two chapters, followed by analysis of the poem, in chapters 3, 4, and 5. The outlines of his life story move in Chapter 1 from Latin lessons in the company of the duke's grandson to a look at the Sessa family and the process of Latino's assimilation. Chapter 2 brings a detailed account of the effects of and response to the edicts of intolerance promulgated at the beginning of 1567. The war and the arrival of John of Austria bring rebellion, which is met by savage repression and leads to the intensification of the slave trade. Part II, "The Epic of Lepanto," plays out in three chapters, opening with the account of the battle that reached Latino and his contemporaries and the reaction to it in Spain. Wright teases out the possible implications of the poet's decision to write his poem in Latin as they relate to the emperor and his imperial ambitions as well as to his own peculiar status as a black man. His prefatory poem, "On the Birth of Untroubled Times," speaks specifically to these issues, warning of the adverse implications of racism for the eastern expansion of empire. For Wright, the recent translation of the poem into English is "propitious for delving into this early and eloquent statement of pride from a diasporic African based in Europe" (97). Chapter 4, "Christians and Muslims on the Battle Lines," views the historic battle from the point of view of post-rebellion Granada, where his patron, Pedro de Deza, held sway. Wright perceptively examines and weighs the complex of factors influencing the encomium with which Latino introduces his poem: shifting the focus from Deza to himself, and the patronage quest from Deza to Philip II; replacing the Classical deities invoked in the epic tradition with those of the Christian formulary along the way and moving from pagan Olympus to the baptismal font. Citations from Virgil's Aeneid link Ottoman Turks with ancient Trojans. [End Page 544] Wright highlights the interposition of the "Moorish rower, captured and bound in chains," original, she says, among the many other accounts of that historic encounter, and she recognizes references to Lucan's view of war in his Pharsalia. "The Costs of Modern Warfare" closes the consideration of the text with consideration of the tension that Wright finds in the poem between "historical documentation and epic artistry." She compares Latino's close-up view of the battle with Francisco de Herrera's panoramic perspective, and contrasts Herrera's individualized noble protagonists with the "nameless foot soldiers" of Latino. One key divergence from other Lepanto epics, Wright finds, is the plight of Ali Pasha's bereft sons, pointing out that their lamentation is the longest speech in the poem. Latino's account of Lepanto as "an epochal naval victory undercut by some tactical...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.027
Threshold uncertainty score0.055

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.003
Scholarly communication0.0040.002
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0130.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.222
Teacher spread0.208 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMLNSame topicLatin American history and cultureFrench-language works237,207