Interdisciplinaridade, arte e cultura popular na educação básica segundo o discurso dos documentos legais vigentes
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ResumoO objetivo deste artigo é analisar as menções à interdisciplinaridade, à arte e à cultura popular no discurso da legislação vigente nos aspectos em que se refere à educação básica. O corpus desta pesquisa abrange a Constituição da República Federativa do Brasil, a Lei de Diretrizes e Bases da Educação Nacional, o Plano Nacional de Educação e as Diretrizes Curriculares Nacionais Gerais para a Educação Básica vigentes. A análise documental proposta fundamentou-se em conceitos de Ivani Fazenda sobre interdisciplinaridade, de Ana Mae Barbosa sobre Arte-Educação, de Carlos Brandão sobre cultura popular e Luís Dourado sobre políticas educacionais. Os resultados expressam a preocupação com o acesso aos bens culturais e artísticos e às relações entre teoria e prática como dimensão interdisciplinar a ser alcançada. De modo específico nas Diretrizes menciona-se o ensino da arte em suas diferentes linguagens e propõe-se o ensino interdisciplinar por meio de projetos temáticos.Palavras-chave: Interdisciplinaridade; Arte; Cultura popular; Legislação; Educação básica.Interdisciplinarity, art and popular culture in basic education according to the discourse of the current legal documentsAbstractThis paper aims to analyze mentions of interdisciplinarity, arts and popular culture in the basic education aspects in its current legislation discourse. The corpus of this research is composed of the current Constitution of Federative Republic of Brazil, National Educational Bases and Guidelines Law, National Education Plan and General National Curriculum Directives for Basic Education. The documentary analysis is based on Ivani Fazenda’s interdisciplinary concepts, on Ana Mae Barbosa’s Art-Education, on Carlos Brandão’s popular culture and Luís Dourado’s education policy. In general, the findings highlight the concern about the access to artistic and cultural assets as well as the link between theory and practice as interdisciplinary dimension to be achieved. Specifically, the Guidelines mention the teaching of art in its different languages and focus on the interdisciplinary teaching using thematic projects.Keywords: Interdisciplinarity; Art; Popular Culture; Legislation; Basic Education.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.006 | 0.011 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.006 | 0.009 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.008 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.014 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.011 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".